Leonard Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc
No, you're sure not the only one tired of all the talk about the BS going
down in Washington. I'm not familiar with the Aron case but it sounds
like another manufactured defense. They are becoming very popular.
The only case I've been keeping my eyes open for news about is the Lisa
Lambert appeals up in Penna. Sue and me seem to be the only ones keeping
up with that. I don't get court TV and have been kinda busy lately. It's
diffcult to wade thru all the posts when most seem to be about the BS in DC.
Len
At 08:45 PM 3/22/1998 EST, you wrote:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Is anyone at all interested in the Ruthann Aron case that goes to the jury
>this week? She is the MD legislator who (allegedly) hired a hit man to kill
>her husband and an attorney. In fact, the defense isn't questioning whether
>or not she did that, so I guess the allegedly isn't necessary. They are
>claiming brain damage and mental illness -- "borderline personality" is their
>specific claim. The pros is saying she faked her tests to make herself look
>mentally ill. I don't know where the brain damage bit came from -- no one
>seems to have any evidence about that.
>
>Surely there's something to talk about besides the so-called Crisis in
>Washington? If not Aron, then some other case. Am I the only one getting
>bored by all this Jones-Lewinsky-Willey stuff?
>
>Doc
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
>
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
