"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:) Echo your feelings, Kathy -- which is why I posted the 'OTOH'. It's
such a strong if melodramatic move to accuse someone else, not a missing
person suspect, but an actual located and presented person (ha, indeed,
the allegedly jealous other woman!). I wonder what the probabilities are
here. Do you think the jury might say, it's a game, but yet it
introduces reasonable doubt? Hope to hear your view;
cheers, :) LDMF.
> -------------------Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:------------
>
> Hi Linda :)
>
> Here's the biggest problem with their defense to me common sense will
> tell anyone they are trying to make up a defense since they don't
> really have one. First Reco confessed to his friends, and now he's
> trying to accuse one of them he confessed to as the killer. Not a smart
> move IMHO. Second his lawyer is saying it wasn't Reco, okay if it wasn't
> Reco why did he have his shoes and clothes burned? And why was there
> blood on them? Why did Reco jump out the window and try to run when he
> was caught? So far all I see coming from the defense side is they are
> representing a guilty man, I can understand a person becoming enraged
> and killing a boyfriend/girlfriend/spouse but I can not feel anything
> but pure anger at someone who kills children, and he killed 4 little
> kids! Those kids did nothing they were only 5 and three. And according
> to the evidence two of the children tried to get away, that is horrific
> to think of, these little babies running from him with a knife. I know
> I'm not supposed to make a decision on guilt or innocence until all the
> facts are in, but in this case it's a pretty simple one to me, she
> dropped him he got mad and killed her, her children and the nephew and
> niece.
>
> Today they showed the crime scene photo's, a rather hard and emotional
> day for all involved. At least I thought so, the crime scene pictures
> were so horrific that the DA only introduced two of them out of all of
> them they had. From my understanding this case was very hard on LEO's,
> one of them had to take a 30 day leave after seeing the crime scene.
> Others knew the victims and such. This is one of the most emotional
> cases I have seen in a long while, I must admit I did like Reco's mother
> when she testified yesterday, she earned my respect, I don't know if I
> could do as she did and testify against my own son, but I felt she knew
> she was doing right by telling the truth. It could have been so easy for
> her to lie and say he was home, yet she didn't and I respect her for
> that. And I only hope I'm never in the position she was in, I'm sure
> it's torn her apart.
>
> dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.] wrote:
> >
> > "dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Kathy, this 'triangulation' to third party 'virtual-suspect' seems
> > designer-designed for "reasonable doubt." OTOH who knows. It will be
> > interesting to see how this works out. :) LDMF.
> --
> Kathy E
> "I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
> isn't looking too good for you either"
> http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
> http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
> http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
