Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hmm, that's funny. My colleague has investments in a technology firm that is
developing an alternative to the polygraph because it is not effective. It is
based on electrical activity in the brain and pupil dilation. Maybe we can find
that "magic" answer yet. <g>
jackief
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi Jackie,
>
> This is an incredible stretch. Bet you will have one hell of a problem
> finding a broker who can point you to an investment in polygraphs.
>
> Maybe if you sold law firms short...? LOL!
>
> >Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >William J. Foristal wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jackie,
> >>
> >> I agree completely. This is obviously a controversial issue and there
> >> are those who have reasons for having us believe that lie detectors are
> >> the best way to tell if someone is telling the truth or not. Perhaps
> >> they have investments in companies who make the equipment. Who knows?
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >
> >Hi Bill
> >
> >I think it is like our wish to have a "magic" pill to solve everything
> >and/or our faith <g> in technology coming up with all the difficult answers
> >so we can control everything. But, now that you mention it, investments
> >would be a reason.
> >
> >jackief
>
> Best, Terry
>
> "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
