"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sue - yes - its amazing to me that we must have been reading the phrase
you have posted here at the same time, and I stumbled over it before I
went on reading. I didn't know what to say about it; glad you posted
it.
Now about *Netuition* on this or other lists (or rename it if you wish,
I just thought of it) this resonates with our prior discussion of
netizens on one coast linking out, and the same on the other, and
connecting somewhere in that big lattice we call the web. So its not
just for spreading rumours maybe (vbg - which for me, is extreme!) :)
cheers, LDMF.
--------------------------Sue Hartigan wrote:---------------------------
> Hi Dr. L.:
>
> I was just reading this one. :) I found something else that I thought
> was funny...."JUSTICE BREYER, concluded that, because a prisoner under a
> death sentence has a continuing interest in his
> life, the question raised is what process is constitutionally
> necessary to protect that interest. "
>
> I know that it isn't suppose to be funny, but it struck me that way.
>
> Sue
> >
> > In this recent Supreme Court case it was held that voluntary appearance
> > at clemency meeting did not violate an inmates constitutional rights.
> > Posted below is a passage from an abstract of the case. Posted here
> > for its stark imagery and "flippancy" in an all too serious context of
> > murder conviction and death sentence (how does this strike you?):
> >
> > "Judicial intervention might, for example, be warranted in the face of
> > a scheme whereby a state official flipped a coin to determine whether to
> > grant clemency ..." :) LDMF.
>
> --
> Two rules in life:
>
> 1. Don't tell people everything you know.
> 2.
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
