Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Terry :) My replies are below.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The laws I gave you were the most recent I found. I will be glad for any
> updates.
If you use current laws why did you have to go back 50 years to find a
case to support your argument? Don't you see my point? The case you used
was not under the guidelines of the current laws.
> If a 16-year-old commits a murder and is sentenced to die in a subsequent
> trial, you may find comfort in his sitting in prison for a decade or two
> while he waits for his death sentence to be carried out. My interpretation
> is that we kill kids, one of only 6 countries that do. There are currently
> a number of men sitting on death row for murders committed when they >were juveniles.
Oh since kids kill we should just turn our heads? I mean they are just
innocent children right? I don't buy that, I live under the policy if
you're old enough to do the crime your old enough to accept the
punishment. No matter who kills their victims are still dead and justice
needs to be carried out. BTW those men sitting on death row seems to me
they at least got something their victims didn't a chance to prepare and
to say good-bye to their families, why is it that we should listen to
the pleas of the murderers when they themselves decided to ignore the
pleas of their victims? What makes them better than the people they
murdered?
> I remember the 1940's quite well. Slave ships are before my time.
Then you should have known that your argument and example didn't match
up.
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
