"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The same 70% who approve of Clinton's job performance, think that his
private life is no one else's business.
It would help if said politician would (allegedly) keep his
private life zipped up in the workplace. Even if one wholly ignored
the Jones account from-the-hotel-door-portal-on-in,
what is a governor doing summoning a low-level female employee
to a hotel room? That part doesn't seem to be in dispute.
And (allegedly) using public employees in Arkansas and D.C.,
as Cupid's-little-helpers? And when someone sued over that
(alleged) public behavior, (allegedly) perjured and suborned perjury.
None of that is "private life".
That line-having-apparently-been-crossed-by-said-official,
it is fair for some constituents to notice that "his/her" private pursuits
seem to telegraph "his/her" public relations with constituents.
Character matters, and is relevant to political discourse --
perhaps more so than any other factor, given that, lacking character,
no other part of policy/evidence/debate is trustworthy.
If a politician doesn't want his/her private life picked-over,
either keep it out of the public realm, or keep it circumspect.
P.S. No Bill, neither obsessed or jealous of Slick
Women have their faults. Men have only two.
Everything they say. Everything they do.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
