Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Kathy:
There are a lot of things that could have killed those babies other than
SID's or the parents, IMO. 30 years ago there were pesticides,
asbestos, etc that could have been the cause. And if the parents are
not guilty of anything, IMO, I would think that they would be grateful
to find out just what did do it.
There was one thing in your post though that I picked up on that I
wonder if anyone (I'm sure someone did) caught. The lawyer said that
the mother suffered from migraines when the police were questioning her,
and he added to that, that she suffered from "black outs". I found that
kinda questionable.
The father just simply said he thought that they should be left alone,
and that this whole thing should be forgotten, as he slammed the door in
the reporters face. :(
Sue
> Hi Sue :)
>
> My first question is what is he unhappy about? The fact they are
> checking to make sure these were SIDS deaths or the fact his wife is
> being questioned? I personally would want to know how my kids died, if
> possible.
>
> And yes they would have to exhume some of the kids, if not all of them
> to try to find out how they died, of course the two that died in the
> hospital they wouldn't have to, but the others they would.
>
> I hold some doubt about the mothers innocence here, mainly due to the
> fact the others cases I have seen like this were their were multiple
> deaths and SIDS was given as the cause of death, when they went back to
> investigate it's been discovered they were homicides and not SIDS. So
> it's hard to think this case will be any different, it would be nice but
> I don't hold high hopes of it turning out different than the others. Yet
> I would be happy to be wrong in this instance.
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
