Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Terry
Sorry to disappoint you--I said I did not want to discuss something with someone
who only negates, rather than examines and critique everything that does not fit
within that person's version of what is accurate. When you have an opinion that
can be backed with something, be my guest. But, so far this is what you have
offered in rebuttal of the polygraph info I posted and info that others have posted
1..An amicus brief written by Hont's, a person with a vested interest in having the
polygraph admitted (see his vita and his advertisement for professional consultancy
in regard to the polygraph). He says the Iacono & Lykken survey had flaws (not
that it was fraudulent like you posted). If you like I can post the flaws that
were listed in the article concerning the over 10 year old survey conducted by the
Gallup organization that did not even provide their response rate and the Amato
survey with a mere 30% return rate that Honts relies on. Citing flaws in others
work are SOP in the field. That doesn't make the other scientist commit fraud as
you imply.
2. Your absurd statement about Thomas being a perjuror because you have a
constitutional right to call him one, but then I think he might have the
constitutional right to sue you for statements like that said in the wrong context
that have no evidence to support your assertion.
Next came your evidence about the death penalty and killing children.
1. An execution from the 40's. And something about since the 1970's, how many
children were executed?? I just posted the number of children (1 person--aged 17)
as of yearend 1996. And the individual was 17 at the time of arrest. In today's
society, I hardly think a 17 year old is really much of a child.
And then we have your evidence of why Judge Wright was biased. You cite a case
against a politician that has only one similarity to the case brought against
Clinton--they both happened to be Democrats. In the case you cite , the woman was
wearing a tape recorder (what every well-dressed job applicant wears on a job
interview--in fact, they are so common now I am surprised that one of the working
women's magazines haven't published an article "101 fashionable ways to wear your
tape recorder on your next job interview."
And everytime in these cases that someone posted a contrary view, your response was
that they didn't have it correct and any opposing evidence you simply dismissed as
fradulent, not creditable, or said because the person was a Clintonite, or part of
a dubious science (I still laugh at that one--the scientist you used for your
polygraph argument happens to teach psychology and is an experimental
psychologist).
Terry, it would be great if just once you acknowledged that others on this list
have some knowledge and that you may not be the only expert in a particular field
or another. There are very informed people on this list who enjoy exercising their
minds by engaging in controversaries over lots of stuff, but most of us on the list
bow to the person that has either spent a lot of time looking into a topic or are
involved in that field and do know something the rest of us don't. I wouldn't
think of conducting a gyn exam over the internet, but I know an individual on here
that can, and is expert at it so I bow to that person's expertise when it comes to
those kind of topics.
jackief
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi Mac,
>
> >moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >Ronald Helm wrote:
> >
> >> "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >ASSAULT? I didn't know you were a witness to any assault! Strong words from
> >> a weak mind.
> >>
> >> Watch it Mac. Where is Ed when we need him :-) Are you going to take that
> >> from Mac, Terry? Ron
> >
> >Afternoon Ron, I don't think he has much choice. He's still down from
> hurtin' jackie put
> >on him.
> >...Mac
>
> Jackie said she didn't want to hear my opinion any more. I respected her
> wishes. It's a terrible loss alright but I can take it.
> Best, Terry
>
> "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
