moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi Mac,
> >It seems like there is more than meets the eye and when you look at as a
> whole >there appears to be a machine fueling the allegations. This makes me
> suspicious >of the accuser and of the story they have to sell/tell.
>
> Do you see your problem?
No, enlighten me if you can.
>
>
> >> Clinton himself remains remarkably silent while
> >> his henchmen make the crudest imaginable attacks on those on the White House
> >> enemies list.
>
> >Most likely on the advice of his lawyers and common sense.
>
> Yup. :-}
>
> >It seems to me that Paula Jones kept silent also and had a plattoon of
> >spokespersons and lawyers doing her attacking.
> >Double standard, Terry!
>
> Paula Jones told her story, Mac. We are still waiting for Clinton's lawyers
> to let him use his - ummm - good sense. Who has a double standard?
PJ has told many stories and her complaint took on a life of its own. There is onlyone
truth and there is no need to change it. The president denied these allegations
and IMO is listening to good advice. His adversaries have done him more good than harm.
They have tried to use sex as a weapon and have failed in the eyes of the people.
So far the double standard still lies with you.
>
>
> >> Nixon, after all this time, has been exposed as a crude
> >> amateur compared to the current occupant of the White House.
> >
> >I think Nixon was a pro and hardly crude.
>
> There were a lot expletives deleted as I recall.
What are you referring to?...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
