[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes: HI Ron, LOL...all of this is old news and does not seem to contain any smoking gun. If the REPUBLICANS are distancing themselves from Starr and his witch hunt, surely you don't think there is much of a chance for an impeachment do you? BTW, those billing records that were misplaced and suddenly found in the White House? Well guess what. They found duplicates of them in Vince Foster's old papers in the attic of his house. And guess what again? They were IDENTICAL to the ones found in the White House. Ooops, another dead end. Newsweek says it best this week on their cover. It's time for Starr to put up or shut up. But I continue to LMAO when I think of all the glee and reverie shown by several people on these lists when the Supreme Court over ruled Judge Wright's order that the civil suit be postponed until after Clinton leaves office. And when the Lewinsky thing went public there was more dancing in the streets and on the lists with some morons predicting that Clinton would resign by the end of the week. You guys must feel like the Chicago Cubs of political discussions. ROTF! Bill On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 11:12:52 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Sure Bill, the case is closed, Clinton has been vindicated, this was >all a >vast right wing conspiracy. It is Clinton that has allegedly been >doing all >these things, not Starr. Bennett may be a "good lawyer" (oxymoron if >ever >there was one), but he has a bad client. Ron > >Jury - Twelve people who determine which client has the better lawyer. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Newspaper: Starr Report on Clinton Under Way >> >>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Independent counsel Kenneth Starr's >prosecutors >>have already written large parts of their report to the House of >>Representatives on potentially impeachable alleged offenses by >President >>Clinton involving former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, The >>Washington Post reported in its Wednesday editions. >> >>The Post, citing sources close to the investigation, said the >>"potentially impeachable offenses" being written up by Starr's office >>may also include "material related to Clinton's sworn testimony about >>Arkansas financial dealings." >> >>Starr has been investigating whether Clinton perjured himself or >tried >>to obstruct justice in the now-dismissed Paula Jones sexual >misconduct >>case regarding an alleged sexual relationship with Lewinsky. >> >>Starr's first focus was a failed real estate deal known as Whitewater >>undertaken by Clinton and his wife Hillary when he was governor of >>Arkansas in the 1980s. >> >>"Starr and his legal staff have -- for the first time in their >four-year >>investigation of the president -- assembled evidence that they >believe >>requires a report to the House of Representatives," the paper said. >> >>The statute creating the independent counsel mandates that such a >report >>be made whenever prosecutors find "any substantial and credible >>information ... that may constitute grounds for impeachment." >> >>Clinton has steadfastly denied any wrongdoing in the Whitewater real >>estate tangle and denied any effort to influence Lewinsky's testimony >in >>the Jones case, which a federal judge threw out a week ago as >unworthy >>of a jury trial. >> >>A White House spokesman, Joe Lockhart, declined comment on the Post >>report, which cited sources as saying Starr's goal was to finish his >>report on the Lewinsky matter and submit it to the House by the end >of >>next month. >> >>The independent counsel's report on Whitewater could take months >longer >>to put together, the Post reported. It said that report would go to >the >>federal judges who appointed Starr and would not raise impeachment >>issues. Any new indictments by Starr could delay both reports, the >paper >>said. >> >>Separately, the Post reported that Starr was looking into the failure >of >>Clinton and his attorneys to turn over correspondence from former >White >>House volunteer Kathleen Willey when directed to by lawyers for >Jones. >> >>In a new angle to his investigation of whether Clinton committed >perjury >>or obstructed justice in the Jones case, Starr Monday subpoenaed her >>Dallas law firm, seeking a "critical" document relating to Clinton's >>withholding of the Willey letters in January. >> >>Two months later, the White House made the letters public to undercut >>Willey's televised allegation, denied by Clinton, that he made an >>unwelcome sexual advance. >> >>Several areas of Starr's investigation of Clinton appear to be >>concluding without charges, the paper said, including: >> >>-- the search of deputy White House counsel Vince Foster's office >after >>his July 1993 suicide. >> >>-- the aftermath of 1993 firings in the White House travel office. >> >>-- the mysterious discovery of Hillary Clinton's long-sought Rose Law >>firm billing records detailing her work for Madison Guaranty Savings >and >>Loan, a failed thrift that had been run by the Clintons' partner in >the >>Whitewater land deal, the late James McDougall. >> >>The Post said Starr had not been able to learn who had the records >while >>they were missing or why they suddenly appeared in the White House >>residence, long after they were subpoenaed by a grand jury. ^REUTERS@ > > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues > _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
