"Steve Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No I would agree completely, the fact is the only way there would be peace
would be for Irish people from both sides to get together and talk, Britain
should never have been involved, its not really our business and its a shame
that so many good people died before this happened.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Saturday, April 11, 1998 10:54 PM
Subject: Re: L&I Applause and Caution Greet N.Ireland Deal
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Steve: Are you aware that the "peace in N. Ireland" could never have been
>>achieved without the help of Slick? Is he getting all the credit for
this
>>peace accord in England, that he is claiming for himself in the U.S.? Ron
>
>I don't know if Steve will agree but I don't think any one man is more
>responsible for a peace settlement, and hopefully peace, than Clinton.
>England could never hope to quell the dissent from the Catholics in
Northern
>Ireland without recognizing their aspirations and complaints. They have
>tried that for centuries have not been notably successful.
>Best, Terry
>
>"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
>
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
