Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie:
I like those perks. <BG> When do I get to start. Shopping that is. :)
That really is a very interesting question about perception. I have
thought about it myself and wondered why one persons was more important
and took on more meaning than anothers.
There was a very good show on Nightline last night featuring a Special
Judge, a DA, and a defense attorney. Each had to work with the DP in
different ways. They each gave their thoughts about how they felt about
this. It really was very good. I put the transcript on here today, but
if you didn't get it I can go back and get it for you.
Sue
> Hi Sue
>
> LOL And of course, as an expert witness, you would qualify for shopping trips,
> beauty salons, etc, too. What a deal, huh. My students wanted to know why one
> person's perception of an event took precedence over another person's perception in
> some of the cases, especially if you did not have to show consequences--job-related
> or emotional that required professional help? Made for lively discussion. The best
> part is that it was the women in the class that were the most adamant that there had
> to be consequences. May explain why the women's groups do not just jump right in.
> Next week, they are bringing information on the death penalty--pro and con. Should
> be interesting.
>
> jackief
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
