[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
That was my point. It was the democratic party who was doing the
attacking against Nixon and they DID win the White House in the next
election. I was simply conditioning the observation by noting that Nixon
was shown to be guilty of breaking the law, so that probably helped
Carter in the election. If nothing is proven then the public will tend
to hold the attacking party more responsible for false accusations, IMO.
Bill
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 12:46:37 -0800 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>I should have said it better. Bobby was saying the attacking party
>never wins the WH in the next election. But you proved the point. :)
>
>Sue
>>
>> HI Sue,
>>
>> Well, Jimmy Carter won the WH in 1977 after they had gotten Nixon in
>> 1974.
>>
>> But Nixon resigned after they had the evidence that he had broken
>the
>> law. So maybe that doesn't count. But the democrats went after
>Nixon big
>> time and the Republicans defended Nixon until the truth became
>obvious.
>>
>> Bill
>
>--
>Two rules in life:
>
>1. Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
