Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
Oh, I will have to ask him about this one, because he said last night
that it was part of his point. Now I wonder if he knows anymore what he
is talking about than I do. <BG>
He probably ment it the same way that you did.
Sue
>
> Hi Sue,
>
> That was my point. It was the democratic party who was doing the
> attacking against Nixon and they DID win the White House in the next
> election. I was simply conditioning the observation by noting that Nixon
> was shown to be guilty of breaking the law, so that probably helped
> Carter in the election. If nothing is proven then the public will tend
> to hold the attacking party more responsible for false accusations, IMO.
>
> Bill
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
