Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue
I wasn't aware that they sometimes used 2 years and under. I knew about the 1
year cutoff and the 28 day cutoff for neonatal deaths, but this is new to me.
Will have to make sure I check the data really carefully when comparing to make
sure of the cutoffs are the same. Thanks for pointing out another problem with
statistics. Oh those darn statistics. : )
jackief
Sue Hartigan wrote:
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Bill:
>
> It would be a child 12 months old or less, or sometimes in certain
> studies two years old or less.
>
> Sue
> >
> > Hi Jackie,
> >
> > Interesting research you've got ahead of you. My only comment about the
> > lead paint factor was wondering at what age a child's death is considered
> > an "infant mortality". This would have a big bearing on studying the
> > causes of infant mortality, I would think. Good luck with your search
> > for information.
> >
> > Bill
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
