Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue
I don't know who leaked it finally, but I would imagine someone at the Pentagon after
the digging
started. Somehow I wonder if Tripp doesn't have a direct hotline to someone or
something--like you
say, she is always there in the background.
I watched 60 Minutes too, as did Ed. Ed found her very creditable, but I was a little
cynical. I
kept wavering back and forth as she talked. I can see ole Bill (C) doing the number
with Jones and
Lewinsky, but somehow I would think he was a little smarter than to try it with one of
his friend's
wife out of the clear blue sky. I am not saying that she invited this if it occurred,
but common
sense tells me most people don't sh## in their own backyards, so to speak. It seemed
in some
instances though that she was trying to close up some of the arguments that the
defense could
suggest in the Lewinsky affair. One thing I caught (or thought I heard)--it wasn't in
the Oval
office, but his study, right?? Little detail, I know, but those little details are
sometimes
important. Another thing that bothered me somewhat is the naive, hesitant little girl
that was on
60 Minutes (my, my, such cynicism this morning). This is no 21 year old intern and
this was someone
who did not want the story public. If someone had made my story public, I would not
be this
hesitant little woman--I would be angry that a friend had made a pass and a friend had
made it
public and drew me into this mess. But, I am not Willey.
I have a tough time with Bennett sometimes--he is a good example of the good ole' boy
network and
their ideas about women. Remember his remark about Jones? And, sometimes I feel he
is about to
make another wonderful statement like he did then.
So I am still waiting--but I still think the money could be spent in better places and
I am
wondering more about the deal where a private citizen cannot bring up ethics charges
on a
Congressperson, only another Congressperson is allowed to do that. Hmm.
jackief
jackief
Sue Hartigan wrote:
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Jackie:
>
> Hey you might just have hit on something there. <BG> Who did leak it
> finally do you know?
>
> I saw the Katherine Willey interview tonight on 60 Minutes. And she did
> come across as being very creditable. But then the Presidents lawyer
> talked for a few minutes, and his explanation sounded good too. The
> part about her being very upset and couldn't find her husband, etc. )
> Her husband committed suicide while she was there talking to the
> President that day.) But she did sound very creditable...
>
> Linda Trapp..er I mean Tripp was there then too. That woman sure knows
> where to be and when to be there doesn't she.
>
> Sue
>
> > Hi Sue
> >
> > Read the post earlier about how Tripp's lawyer said she was set-up. Hmmmm. She
>just happened
> > to have the goods in her purse. How much you want to bet that Starr wasn't aware
>of this when
> > he gave her immunity. What I find interesting about this is if this is the case,
>and the w.h.
> > was so guilty of obstructing justice and smearing their accusers then this should
>have been
> > leaked to the media ages ago. Could that mean the w.h. were not engaged in those
>tactics, I
> > wonder.
> >
> > I'll have to figure out what you should be the expert witness so we both can rake
>in the
> > millions <vbg>
> >
> > jackief
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
