Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Mac:
And she was the only one that seemed so credible.
Sue
> Evenin',
> It appears that with the publisher Michael Viner's relevation this evening about
> Ms.Willey's book proposal that something very wrong and illegal has surfaced.
> By all accounts Willey's, story according to her letters and the book proposal,
> her relationship with the president has been a good one and she was proud to be
> associated with him and the party. It is a fact that her deceased husband has left
>her in
> financial ruins. She turned to Clinton for some help in getting some gainful
>employment.
> Things didn't work out quite the way she expected and her financial situation has not
> improved. About 8 weeks ago her lawyer contacted Mr. Viner, a well known publisher
> from L.A., about a book deal. Her lawyer was hoping for "Paula Barbiari kind of
>money"
> ie...millions. Her story was of little interest. the talks continued. Ken Starr and
>his
> investigators got a hold of her and she "reluctantly" went in front of the grand
>jury.
> After her appearance she chose to go on 60 Minutes and tell a different tale than
>what she
> told
> to her would be publisher. Mr. Viner fought with his conscience about going public
>with
> this change of the story. when he dropped this bombshell on tonights Internight show
>the
> response from a Clinton basher and a lawyer was a question of wether or not there was
> a publisher-client privilege. There isn't.
> From my seat on the beach Ms. Willey has concocted this fable in order to get the
>book
> deal she needed to get herself out of debt. Desperate times call for desperate
>measures
> I guess.
> ...Mac
--
May the leprechauns be near you to spread luck along your way. And may
all the Irish angels smile upon you this St. Patrick's Day.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
