Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Kathy:
I think that if you read what I told Bill you would see that I basically
am saying the same thing. There were people in the Simpson trial that
were used because they had either written a book (Resnick) or been paid
by Hard Copy (Snively) or the Enquirer (the knife brothers). If their
testimony had been used perhaps something different would have come of
that circus.
I was watching Eye to Eye just now, and I don't know anymore about
Kathleen Willey than what I saw on 60 Minutes, but it sure looks like a
deal where someone is trying hard to discredit her. I do have one
question, if everything that these people are saying is true, wouldn't
she have known that before she went on 60 Minutes. And knowing that
wouldn't she have thought about it quite a bit before she did.
I don't know how in the world anyone is going to ever know who lied and
who didn't. Not in this mess.
IMO Starr's investigation is going to go nowhere. All that is going to
come out of it is a big bill for the taxpayers. There are too many
people on both sides who are not telling the truth, and there is no way
that anyone can ever figure out what is what.
That is unless an *eye witness* suddenly jumps out of the bushes. And
the way that this thing is going that just might happen.
Have you heard anything about the actress from the Highlander show? She
supposedly had an affair with Clinton too, and now she is suppose to be
before the grand jury, and then there is the model from New York. Does
it ever end?
Sue
>
> Hi Sue :)
>
> And what light does the book deal shed? None I'm aware of. Also
> concerning it being a he said she said. That is the way sexual
> harrassment always has been, most people don't try a move when there is
> an audience to watch. They do it in private.
>
--
May the leprechauns be near you to spread luck along your way. And may
all the Irish angels smile upon you this St. Patrick's Day.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
