moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sue Hartigan wrote:
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Mac:
>
> I don't know why it surprised me, but it did. The other day I was in
> the checkouts and there on the Star, Enquirer, and a few others were
> pictures and stories of Clinton.
>
> For some reason it just hit me wrong. The office of the Presidency
> should hold some kind of respect. But here it is in the same trash that
> holds the story of some three headed alien that came down and managed to
> mate with an alligator or something.
>
> I certainly wouldn't want to be the next guy who is running for the
> office of President either. Unless this guy came straight out of a
> monastery, I can't imagine anyone not having something in their
> background that they don't want people to know. Well then there is
> Quayle <BG>
>
> But do we really want someone in that office that is sooo perfect that
> they wouldn't be able to relate to the everyday guy. I don't think I
> would.
>
> Ther has to be a happy medium out there somewhere.
>
> Sue
Afternoon Sue,
It's the sexiness of the case that sells. Americans drool over it and the press
relishes it. I think if we put anyone under the same microscope as Clinton there
would be something there for someone to take issue with.
...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
