moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
> HI Sue,
>
> The real question is why release ANY of the tapes? It's not up to the
> public to indict anyone. It's not up to the public to convict anyone.
> Doesn't releasing the tapes poison any jury pool they could hope to draw
> from if there IS an indictment?
>
> I heard that a member of Burton's committee has resigned. Apparently he
> was the one who was pushing for the release of the tapes over the
> objections of several other committee members.
>
> Bill
Afternoon Bill,
It should have been Burton who resigned. This guy has been offered up as a sacrifice
for a decision made by Burton. He admittedly went through the tapes and selected what
would be released and how. From my perspective this was far more egregious than what
clinton is being pursued for. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!! There is danger in the air and you sit
and act like you just don't care.
...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
