Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jackie,
>
> Exactly! Using their own logic it is obvious that Susan McDougal's
> refusal to testify is more indicative of Clinton's innocence than his
> guilt.
>
> Bill
>
Hi Bill
I forget not all of us have that clear, lucid logical mind--only
Republicans disguised as Democrats?? <LOL>. I'm still wondering what
voting or not voting for Clinton has to do with being logical? Liking or
believing Clinton or Starr really isn't part of the equation. Once I figue
that out then I too might be logical <VBG>. All I know is that both
Clinton and Starr have a vested interested in the result of this political
farce. Seems it is just like statistics--you can find statistics to
support both sides of an issue
jackief
> _____________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
