[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:


HI Sue,

The publisher is also saying that the original story they came to him
with concerning the book deal is a different story from what she is now
telling.

Bill

On Wed, 18 Mar 1998 10:09:47 -0800 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Kathy:
>
>
>According to the lawyer who is handling the case for the clients her
>husband stole the money from, Kathleen made a sworn statement which 
>said
>the on the day of her husband's death she went to the WH to do her 
>daily
>job, and talked to no one there that day.  She is also still legally
>responsible for the money that her husband stole which is in the
>neighborhood of 30 thousand dollars.  And the clients are actively
>trying to recover it.
>
>I got this off of Bryant Gumbles show last night, where the attorney
>appeared with the sworn statement of Kathleen's.  :(
>
>Sue
>> 
>> Hi Mac :)
>> 
>> You and I just have so much butting heads don't we :) :)
>> 
>> I am going on what I know. Now I'm about 24hrs behind on the news 
>due to
>> other things I was busy with, I have seen the president change his
>> story, I have seen his lawyer change his story I have not seen 
>Kathleen
>> change her story. Matterfact here in VA a while ago they had a write 
>up
>> about the players in this, and her name was mentioned. The only 
>thing I
>> have seen that people are keying in on is this, she wanted a book 
>deal
>> she wanted $300,000 advance the book deal was turned down by the 
>same
>> company that published OJ's books. What is NOT being reported though 
>by
>> many is this, he said now he is more than happy to publish her book, 
>at
>> the time it was first proposed he didn't realize it was such a hot 
>story
>> per se. It wasn't because he doubted her story at all it was because 
>he
>> didn't realize the impact of her story. 20/20 hindsight has shown 
>him
>> the errors of his ways.
>> 
>> Now how has she changed her story? And according to who has she 
>changed
>> her story?
>> 
>> Remember one thing at the beginning of this I personally didn't 
>care,
>> matterfact I deleted most of the messages concerning this whole 
>subject,
>> but I made a point of watching her interview and I just didn't see
>> anything that showed me she was untruthful. I did see that on the 
>other
>> side of the fence though. And I still can't get past one thing that
>> bothers the heck out of me, why did Clinton change his story 
>concerning
>> the meeting with her??? First he didn't remember it, then he 
>suddenly
>> has a very clear memory of it? What gives here? Something isn't 
>right.
>> 
>> moonshine wrote:
>> >
>> > moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > Mornin' Kathy,
>> >     If Ms.Willey is so credible then why did she change her story 
>for the
>> > book deal? Her original proposal had nothing salacious or sexy 
>about it.
>> > When that version didn't sell her story took on another flavor. 
>C'mon
>> > now Kathy...you must admit that there is something amiss here.
>> > ...Mac
>> --
>> Kathy E
>> "I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and 
>tomorrow
>> isn't looking too good for you either"
>> http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
>> http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
>> http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime 
>photo's
>> 
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
>-- 
>Two rules in life:
>
>1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]


Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to