Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Jackie: Dr. L. explained it as a statute. Still doesn't explain why it was allowed in the Paula Jones case. :( Sue > Hi Sue and Kathy > > No luck in my two cj. dictionaries. Of course, sexual relations are not > usually against the law I guess. > > jacjuef Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- L&I Here is the definition of sex Mr. President Kathy E
- Re: L&I Here is the definition of sex Mr. Pr... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Here is the definition of sex Mr... Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Here is the definition of se... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Here is the definition o... Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Here is the definit... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Here is the def... Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Here is the definition of sex Mr... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Here is the definition of se... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Here is the definition o... Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Here is the definition of sex Mr. Pr... Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff
- Re: L&I Here is the definition of sex Mr... Jackie Fellows
