Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hogwash. They are the most effective means known of showing lies. Police
> agencies and security agencies have great faith in them. Why would they do
> that?
>
> Best, Terry
>
Hi Terry
No they are not the most effective means of showing lies. If they were, they would
be permissible in court. Any antisocial can pass a lie detector, even one who is
not a criminal. Pathological liars can pass a lie detector; people whose physical
responses do not follow a normal pattern can pass a test; the person giving the test
can mess up the findings; the phrasing of the questions can alter the findings.
One other thing I disagree with--Starr just calls everyone to testify at the grand
jury--seems he has a bigger stick in this case to initimidate in some respects. So
both sides are engaging in some 'dirty pool', not just the wh.
jackief
> "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
