[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Hi Sue,

>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Terry:
>
>There are two reasons why I wonder about her story, other than the fact
>that things do seem to get added. 
>
>First being she took until just a short time before the statue of
>limitations ran out to file her claim.  If she was so humiliated and
>hurt why did it take so long?

Most women never report such an incident or a more serious rape.  Jones says
she had no intention of reporting anything until the continuing stories of
her dalliances with Clinton were put in print.

You should understand that suit was filed under a somewhat novel
interpretation of one law and that time had expired on normal charges.

I think the time women take to level charges is a complete red herring.
Most of those who use this argument against Jones have no problem with Anita
Hill's much longer silence. 

>Secondly she was id'd as only Paula in the obscure magazine The
>Spectator, and no one even knew who this person was even if they
>happened to be the one person who happened to read this publication.

She didn't read it.  It was pointed out to her by a friend who did read it.
Her circle of acquaintances was quite well aware of the whispers and knew
damn well who "Paula" was.

>Now she is saying that her sexual ability has decreased due to this
>happening.  Which IMO is something that will be impossible to prove one
>way or the other.  
>
>Sue 

I think personally that is a silly claim and is only a ploy by her lawyers
to shore up the legalities.  Seems a blunder to me but what do I know.
Fantastic claims are upheld in court.

That Jones was upset should be obvious to anyone.  Her determination and
unwillingness to compromise is incredible.  She has taken blasts from the
Clinton hatchet men and broadsides from the like of Sam Donaldson that would
unnerve a charging rhinoceros.
Best,     Terry 

"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law"  - The Devil's Dictionary 



Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to