On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:26:34 +0200 Michael Schnell via Lazarus <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> On 15.08.2017 11:15, Tony Whyman via Lazarus wrote: > > Why shouldn't there be a single char type that intuitively represents > > a single character regardless of how many bytes are used to represent it. > > I suppose by "char" you mean "single printable thingy" with Unicode it's > rather debatable what such a thingy is. > > Hence a Unicode singe char would need to be just be a Unicode string. Do you mean a 'char' is a string in your proposal? Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus