On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 14:26:34 +0200
Michael Schnell via Lazarus <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
On 15.08.2017 11:15, Tony Whyman via Lazarus wrote:
> Why shouldn't there be a single char type that intuitively represents
> a single character regardless of how many bytes are used to represent it.
I suppose by "char" you mean "single printable thingy" with Unicode it's
rather debatable what such a thingy is.
Hence a Unicode singe char would need to be just be a Unicode string.
Do you mean a 'char' is a string in your proposal?
That would be a neat recursive definition :)
Michael.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
