On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:

[our company is experiencing SMTP problems with our ISP, so excuse any
duplicate emails from me]

2009/11/16 Michael Van Canneyt <[email protected]>:

If DPCrypt's license matches the FCL one, I see no reason not to
include it.


It is already ok I think (MIT/BSD license without advocacy clause). From
previous discussions in fpc-pascal mailing list, Marco said this will be
fine for FCL.


Really ? I am not so sure about this.

This should be taken up first prior to continuing.

Michael.

--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to