Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:38:06PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2009/11/29 Marco van de Voort <[email protected]>:
The serious users will consider the current restrained version policy as
Personally, if we are going to approach this marketing driven, I'm more in
favour of the slackware approach (as they did when they jumped from 3.6 to
7).
its a clear policy (a new release always has the major release number of the
competition +1), and a suffix in case there is no new competitor release.
Heck, why not just January release, version 'Year', followed by a July
release, version 'Year.5' ?
Year.5 being bug fixes for Year, and each new next Year being trunk?
Wash, rinse, repeat for each year of existence?
At least it will put this kind of nonsensical discussions to rest (which is
exactly why Patrick did this)
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
--
LyX: http://www.lyx.org/ OpenOffice: http://www.openoffice.org/
Inkscape: http://www.inkscape.org/ Scribus: http://www.scribus.net/
GIMP: http://www.gimp.org/ PDF: http://www.pdfforge.org/
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
