I believe that originally only qtcore and qtgui were required for LCL-Qt, but the list has grown over time. Qt is starting to look like .NET/Mono in its all-encompassing, everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach, as well as in its size (the entire Mono framework on OS X is only 200MB).
Thanks. -Phil ----- "Luiz Americo Pereira Camara" <[email protected]> wrote: > Phil Hess escreveu: > > Yes, Webkit is used too, which drags in many of the other Qt > libraries. > > This (webkit support) could be provided as a separate package to > minimize LCL-Qt requirements > > > QtGui and QtCore alone do not have any other dependencies on Qt > libraries. > > > > Most of win32 Qt applications i know use only those. Earlier, i > thought > that LCL-Qt/win32 requirement would be similar. > > > On Mac, the Qt4 frameworks are about 100MB. For Linux this may not > be a problem if Qt comes pre-installed and is used by other apps, but > it does seem a bit excessive on OS X and Windows. > > > > It's sad. This can be an obstacle to Qt usage outside Linux > > > Win API is a low-level C interface, but on Mac Cocoa is a high-level > GUI framework. So that means high-level LCL wrapping high-level Qt > wrapping high-level Cocoa. > > > > Good catch > > Luiz > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
