On Sunday 06 December 2009 18:37, Phil Hess wrote: > I believe that originally only qtcore and qtgui were required for LCL-Qt, > but the list has grown over time. Qt is starting to look like .NET/Mono in > its all-encompassing, everything-but-the-kitchen-sink approach, as well as > in its size (the entire Mono framework on OS X is only 200MB).
No it's not. Ppl. want webkit so that's the reason why we need QtNetwork + QtWekKit (instead of QtCore + QtGui). There was already some questions about splitting C bindings into it's packages so: libqt4intf-core is for QtCore libqt4intf-gui is for QtGui libqt4intf-network is for QtNetwork etc etc That will fix problems and I would like it so, but who will make such C bindings (for all lcl supported platforms !) ? Any volonteers here ? ;) zeljko -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
