Marco van de Voort schrieb:

I don't see any big development (or interest from _contributing_ users) in
dynamic libraries. (and there are many pitfalls and multiplatform gotcha's
here. There is not even a good inventorisation what should work how).

IMO a facility would be great, that allows to share code of other languages (C in the *nix world), and binary libraries (.DLL, .so).

The ability of dynamic linking/binding is important in the use of LGPL libraries, when an application should *not* become LGPL itself, only because it uses such libraries.

DoDi


--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to