On 15 May 2010 00:50, Juha Manninen wrote: > advanced features and then you must update. If it takes few years then Lazarus > will be much better and GTK2 is already replaced with something better, so you > can skip it. :-)
Hopefully Lazarus would have reached v1.0 by then. :-) What I find strange though is that GTK2 is now at 2.30 (I think), yet Lazarus developers (and users) are still talking about *not* bumping the lowest supported GTK2 from 2.6 (I think) to something newer. 2.6 -> 2.30 is a lifetime apart! Surely it's time Lazarus starts taking advantage of GTK2 features that have appear in the last 5+ years of GTK2 development? LCL-Qt was very quickly bumped from Qt v3 to Qt v4, so why not GTK2? [um, maybe I should restrain myself from posting to the Lazarus mailing list again - I'm asking way to many questions. <wink>] -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
