On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:52:04AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > will be much better and GTK2 is already replaced with something better, so > > you > > can skip it. :-) > > Hopefully Lazarus would have reached v1.0 by then. :-) > > What I find strange though is that GTK2 is now at 2.30 (I think), yet > Lazarus developers (and users) are still talking about *not* bumping > the lowest supported GTK2 from 2.6 (I think) to something newer. > > 2.6 -> 2.30 is a lifetime apart! Surely it's time Lazarus starts > taking advantage of GTK2 features that have appear in the last 5+ > years of GTK2 development? LCL-Qt was very quickly bumped from Qt v3 > to Qt v4, so why not GTK2?
The trouble is that many stable and enterprise distributions are simply old. These versions are still being deployed. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
