On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:14 +0100, zeljko wrote: > > > > I think we should not change a thing, until the problem is clear. Maybe > > we can come up with some 'general' transaction-isolation levels. The > > reason they are not implemented in a general way is that each DB has > > it's own locking-style. > > Here is nice explanation of isolation levels, "general" transaction-isolation > levels should be implemented definitelly. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolation_%28database_systems%29
Well, these are tne ansi/sql transacion isolation levels. do you know a database which actually uses/supports these? (Except from Oracle) It's very difficult to generalize this. Joost. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
