On Wednesday 01 December 2010 13:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 13:14 +0100, zeljko wrote: > > > I think we should not change a thing, until the problem is clear. Maybe > > > we can come up with some 'general' transaction-isolation levels. The > > > reason they are not implemented in a general way is that each DB has > > > it's own locking-style. > > > > Here is nice explanation of isolation levels, "general" > > transaction-isolation levels should be implemented definitelly. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isolation_%28database_systems%29 > > Well, these are tne ansi/sql transacion isolation levels. do you know a > database which actually uses/supports these? (Except from Oracle)
Yes, PostgreSQL supports all of them. zeljko -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus