On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:35:13 +0100, Sven Barth <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 02.01.2011 20:31, Vincent Snijders wrote: >> 2011/1/2 Sven Barth<[email protected]>: >>> On 02.01.2011 18:07, Bo Berglund wrote: >>>> >>>> But now I wonder if I should go for trunk or the fixes_0_9_28 branch? >>>> If I remember correctly I have seen that the fixes_0_9_28 branch is no >>>> longer maintained, is this really so? >> >> Yes, it is not maintained anymore. >> >>>> Is there some other branch I should use rather than trunk? >>> >>> You could try fixes_0_9_30. It's currently prepared for new release so it >>> might be more stable than trunk and it's definitly better than fixes_0_9_28. >>> >>> You could also use the provided snapshots that include FPC 2.4.2 as well >>> (they are named 0.9.29 currently, trunk is now 0.9.31). They are provided >>> here: ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/snapshots/ >>> >>> >> >> I couldn't have said it better. > >Thanks ^^ > THanks both of you! I am now getting the fixes_0_9_30 branch in addition to the trunk I already retrieved. I also got the fixes_0_9_28 branch before, but I will delete it now. Concerning FPC I like to have it separate from Lazarus so I will use the release version 2.4.2 for my further work. How would I get an fpc cross-compiler for ARM embedded targets? My target runs an embedded version of Debian. But I work in Windows.... -- Bo Berglund Developer in Sweden -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
