Marcos Douglas schrieb:
Working with items of the same name, from different locations (units,
namespaces), requires qualifications all over. That waste of characters in
source code makes code less readable to me.
Waste of characters? Not really. Write xyz.TFoo is not so different of
TxyzFoo. There is one char more.
But it's different from only TFoo, and that's my point.
Duplicate identifiers are used in the same unit in very rare cases only,
so that normally a qualification is not necessary at all.
When you have to use such identifiers, it doesn't matter whether you use
unit or namespace names for disambiguation - you always have to qualify.
Otherwise the "uses" clauses make any further qualification optional.
DoDi
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
