2011/1/10 Michael Van Canneyt <[email protected]>: > > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Marcos Douglas wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Michael Van Canneyt >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The prefix is not needed. It makes it easier, but is by no means a >>> requirement, as long as you keep the unit names separate. >>> >>> Compare >>> >>> Edit1 : myedit.tedit >>> >>> to >>> >>> Edit1 : tmyedit >>> >>> In the second case, you'll cover 99% of all cases. >>> >>> If by any chance there is an overlap, then the first scenario >>> >>> edit1 : myedit.tmmyedit >>> >>> is still an option. >> >> Right! But you saw what I written in first mail of this thread? >> See: >> "If units are namespaces, why not use them in widgets declarations, >> automatic, in Lazarus? >> When we droped a widget in a Form, ie a TEdit, the declarion would be like >> this: >> TForm1 = class(Form) >> Edit1: StdCtrls.TEdit; >> end;" >> >> I talked about the Lazarus put the unit name like a prefix in all classes. > > I know. > > But if implemented, I would strongly suggest that this is an option, off by > default; I would not want it in my code. I don't see the use of it, but of > course each has his way, and if that works better for you, why not...
Thank you, Michael. Marcos Douglas -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
