On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:33:36 +0200 ik <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that LCL package was renamed to a new name,
You think wrong. > so now all of the 3rd party packages that require LCL can not find it. Please give an example. > I think that the package should the be renamed again back to LCL for > backward compatibility. It is still named 'LCL'. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
