On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marco van de Voort <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > > The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that. > > > > Where does it say that? By "LGPL with exception", I gather you mean like > > the license used by FPC? It that case, there is only a "static linking > > exception". You are still required to donate all modifications to the > > LGPL code though, just like the vanilla LGPL license. > > My bad, you are entirely right. The exception absloves you from the clause > that forces dynlinking, not the OSS bits. I don't know what I was thinking. > > I always feel not free with all this free licenses. Regards -- Zaher Dirkey
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
