On 3/30/2011 08:18, Zaher Dirkey wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Marco van de Voort <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > The (L)GPL with exception bit absolves you from that.
>
> Where does it say that? By "LGPL with exception", I gather you mean like
> the license used by FPC? It that case, there is only a "static linking
> exception". You are still required to donate all modifications to the
> LGPL code though, just like the vanilla LGPL license.
My bad, you are entirely right. The exception absloves you from the clause
that forces dynlinking, not the OSS bits. I don't know what I was thinking.
I always feel not free with all this free licenses.
my thoughts, too... for many years ;)
but then again, free beer might "cost" you a few hours labor of one sort or
another, too ;)
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
