Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2011, 14:09 +0200 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Alexander Klenin wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 21:56, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Our class design is way to large to fit on any paper our printers can > >>> handle, or what can even be displayed on a single screen. So we have to > >>> segment our UML class diagrams to specific areas of our product - only > >>> showing the classes in question. eg: Account Invoicing, Learner > >>> Registration, etc. Anything larger and it is information overload! > >>> > >>> So your idea of selecting what classes to diagram is vital. > >> > >> All this possible with fpclasschart. I added a graphviz backend to it a > >> couple of months ago. Graphviz will do the automatic layout. > > > > I have a long-term plan to add shapes to TAChart, to support these > > kinds of TeeChart diagrams: > > http://www.steema.com/uploads/gallery/shape.png > > http://www.steema.com/uploads/gallery/organizational1.png > > > > With proper modularization, they can be used to draw class diagrams > > independently of other TAChart functionality. > > In particular, I hope that data from CodeTools can be used > > for on-line diagram building from IDE. > > Isn't drawing of diagrams a bit far-fetched for a charting component ? > I mean, I can use a screw-driver as a hammer, but this is not really its > purpose, and definitely not the best tool for the job ? > > I can see it as part of a larger 2-D graphics suite, of course.
There is at least aggpas, although I don't know if it is compilable using fpc. And there has been another graphics and shape drawing core with demo apps by a guy named Angus, the rest (family name, project name, link) I forgot and cannot find anymore ... -- Marc Santhoff <[email protected]> -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
