On May 11, 2011, at 10:51 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote: > >> >>>> I would say A as well. However I have no idea what you mean with >>>> virtual units. What are they? Also if I'm not mistaking fppkg lives in >>>> utils. Should this be moved to packages then? >>> >>> That's exactly the idea. When those units are moved to packages, they >>> are available (virtual) to everyone. Lazarus and non-Lazarus. (So making >>> them a Lazarus package is not the right way, imho) >>> >>> Problems of this option can be that the fppkg version installed on a >>> system is different then the version which is used when building the >>> application. The library solves that problem. >>> >> >> Joost, will you move fppkg to ./packages? Do I need to create a report for >> it? > > Just the units need to be moved imho, the actual program not really ?
You're right on that. On a side note, I would like to use some of the features that fppkg implements as well (like setting up the repositories). Is it OK to move these functions to a separate class or unit? This way both fppkg as the GUI can use the same functions and do not need to implement them separately. Darius -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
