On Wed, 11 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 10:51 AM, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011, Darius Blaszyk wrote:
I would say A as well. However I have no idea what you mean with
virtual units. What are they? Also if I'm not mistaking fppkg lives in
utils. Should this be moved to packages then?
That's exactly the idea. When those units are moved to packages, they
are available (virtual) to everyone. Lazarus and non-Lazarus. (So making
them a Lazarus package is not the right way, imho)
Problems of this option can be that the fppkg version installed on a
system is different then the version which is used when building the
application. The library solves that problem.
Joost, will you move fppkg to ./packages? Do I need to create a report for it?
Just the units need to be moved imho, the actual program not really ?
You're right on that. On a side note, I would like to use some of the features
that fppkg implements as well (like setting up the repositories). Is it OK to
move these functions to a separate class or unit? This way both fppkg as the
GUI can use the same functions and do not need to implement them separately.
Sure...
Michael.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
