On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:42:39 -0300 Marcos Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mattias Gaertner > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:00:10 -0300 > > Marcos Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 2011/6/3 Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > Then you found a bug. > > > > > > Mattias, > > > > > > I saw that bug[1] was 'resolved'. Sorry not answer before, but I was very > > > busy. > > > > > > So, I updated my SVN Lazarus to 31119 rev. I did not see any changes > > > about lazbuild... but I saw in /trunk (remember, I use > > > /branches/fixes_0_9_30). > > > The problem was fixed in /trunk (I did not test), but do not in > > > /branches/fixes_0_9_30? > > > > > > [1] http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19474 > > > > This change is not a simple fix, but changes the behavior of lazbuild. > > Formerly lazbuild created a lazarus.new.exe. Users with build scripts > > might expect this. So this change breaks compatibility and should not go > > the fixes branch. > > I didn't test, but I guess 0.9.28 did the same. > > OK, I understand. > So, I can use 'make clean all' and 'lazbuild --build-ide > --pcp=<my_path>' and the script will be create a lazarus.new.exe, not > a lazarus.exe. > Simply my script could uses 'ren' command (on Windows) to rename this > new binary? Yes. > You marked 'resolved'. So, you confirmed my suspicions? Just to be clear. The lazbuild of 0.9.31 creates a lazarus.exe. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
