On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:42:39 -0300 > Marcos Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mattias Gaertner >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:00:10 -0300 >> > Marcos Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > 2011/6/3 Mattias Gaertner <[email protected]>: >> > > > >> > > > Then you found a bug. >> > > >> > > Mattias, >> > > >> > > I saw that bug[1] was 'resolved'. Sorry not answer before, but I was >> > > very busy. >> > > >> > > So, I updated my SVN Lazarus to 31119 rev. I did not see any changes >> > > about lazbuild... but I saw in /trunk (remember, I use >> > > /branches/fixes_0_9_30). >> > > The problem was fixed in /trunk (I did not test), but do not in >> > > /branches/fixes_0_9_30? >> > > >> > > [1] http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=19474 >> > >> > This change is not a simple fix, but changes the behavior of lazbuild. >> > Formerly lazbuild created a lazarus.new.exe. Users with build scripts >> > might expect this. So this change breaks compatibility and should not go >> > the fixes branch. >> > I didn't test, but I guess 0.9.28 did the same. >> >> OK, I understand. >> So, I can use 'make clean all' and 'lazbuild --build-ide >> --pcp=<my_path>' and the script will be create a lazarus.new.exe, not >> a lazarus.exe. >> Simply my script could uses 'ren' command (on Windows) to rename this >> new binary? > > Yes.
Thank you. >> You marked 'resolved'. So, you confirmed my suspicions? Just to be clear. > > The lazbuild of 0.9.31 creates a lazarus.exe. OK, good to know. I will wait for the new version of lazbuild, until then I will continue using the IDE Build command... otherwise I'll forget to update my script when the new version out! =) Thanks for your time. Marcos Douglas -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
