Marcos Douglas wrote:
2011/7/18 Frank Church <[email protected]>:
I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other
installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full
set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the
others, and make was one of the missing ones. The package recompile was
using the wrong set of utilities. The problem may have been in the FPC
compilation. So back to the drawing board on that.
Did you do each step this tutorial?
Try do not change anything. Just follow the tuturial.
The binaries in ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 are made by Make. If you do not
compile FPC with success some files may not have been generated.
I've just completed a build of 2.4.4 on W2K, and after completion found
that the binaries directory didn't include make etc. so I added a
directory from the source tree to my path.
I also noticed that "make install" had failed (silently) to build an
fpc.cfg, presumably because it couldn't find gcc.
I also noticed that the fpc.cfg that the 2.4.2 binary installer created
had an explicit reference to 2.4.2, rather than using $fpcversion.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
