On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marcos Douglas wrote: >> >> 2011/7/18 Frank Church <[email protected]>: >>> >>> I noticed that the Make path was empty, and after comparing to the other >>> installations it seems that the ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 did not contain the full >>> set of files. There were only 48 files the compared with the 70 or so in the >>> others, and make was one of the missing ones. The package recompile was >>> using the wrong set of utilities. The problem may have been in the FPC >>> compilation. So back to the drawing board on that. >> >> Did you do each step this tutorial? >> Try do not change anything. Just follow the tuturial. >> >> The binaries in ..\fpc\bin\i386-32 are made by Make. If you do not >> compile FPC with success some files may not have been generated. > > I've just completed a build of 2.4.4 on W2K, and after completion > found that the binaries directory didn't include make etc. so I added > a directory from the source tree to my path.
The tools (make, etc) are here: http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/branches/fixes_2_4/install/binw32 See the tutorial: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Installing_Lazarus#STEP_.231:_Create_directories_and_get_the_sources > I also noticed that "make install" had failed (silently) to build an fpc.cfg, > presumably because it couldn't find gcc. > If you didn't download the binutils (fpcbuild) you do not have make tool (for Windows). > I also noticed that the fpc.cfg that the 2.4.2 binary installer created had > an explicit reference to 2.4.2, rather than using $fpcversion. > To create fpc.cfg, use fpcmkcfg tool. But I also do not use . See the tutorial: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Installing_Lazarus#STEP_.234:_Create_fpc.cfg_file Marcos Douglas -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
