On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 00:31, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Bart <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would think moving to "Patches" (with or without unassigning) would >> be even more indicative? > > I don't think this solves the confusion. A patch might be in patches > for other reasons then you moving it there. The original reporter of a > patch might have put it there or a developer might have moved it there > for whatever other reason.
In general, I think "Patches" subproject is confusing and should be eliminated. -- Alexander S. Klenin -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
